System and method for identifying a genuine printed document

ABSTRACT

A system and method for verifying that a document is included in a document management system is disclosed. This system and method includes scanning of a scan track of a document, generating document data dependently upon the scanning, comparing the generated document data to stored document data, the stored document data generated dependently upon a prior scanning of the scan track of the document, and outputting an indication of the document being included in the document management system as determined by the comparing.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/993,850, filed Jan. 12, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,652,651, which is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/254,275, filed Apr.16, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,235,734, which is a continuation of U.S.patent application Ser. No. 13/324,663, filed Dec. 13, 2011, now U.S.Pat. No. 8,742,891, which claims priority of U.S. ProvisionalApplication Ser. No. 61/422,359, filed Dec. 13, 2010, now expired, whichis a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/816,601, filed on Jun. 16, 2010, now abandoned, which is acontinuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/653,460,filed on Dec. 15, 2009, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S.patent application Ser. No. 12/462,126, filed on Jul. 29, 2009, now U.S.Pat. No. 8,134,734, which is a continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 12/381,520, filed on Mar. 12, 2009, now abandoned, which is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/356,903, filed onJan. 21, 2009, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 12/218,598, filed on Jul. 16, 2008, now abandoned,all of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth intheir entireties.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of document management and moreparticularly, to a system and method for identifying a genuine printeddocument.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Certain written or printed documents (hereinafter referred to as“documents”) are important and/or valuable. It may be desirable incertain circumstances to independently confirm that such a document isgenuine, and not fraudulent. It may also be desirable in certaincircumstances to confirm that such a document has not been altered in anunauthorized manner.

Embodiments of the invention provide for document authentication thatconfirms that a document is genuine. Embodiments of the inventionprovide for document authentication that confirms that a written orprinted document is genuine, and has not been altered in an unauthorizedmanner. Embodiments of the invention provide for document authenticationthat not only confirms that a written or printed document is genuine,and has not be altered in an unauthorized manner, but also mitigates therisk of losing the document, such as by fire or theft.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method for verifying that a document is included in a documentmanagement system is disclosed. This method includes providing adocument including a scan track of radio frequency readable information,radio frequency scanning the scan track with a scanner head no greaterthan 10 cm in width, generating document data dependently upon the radiofrequency scanning, comparing the generated document data to storeddocument data, the stored document data generated dependently upon aprior radio frequency scanning of the scan track, and outputting anindication of the document being included in the document managementsystem as determined by the comparing.

A method for verifying that a document is included in a documentmanagement system is disclosed. This method includes providing adocument including a scan track having scanner readable information,optically scanning the scan track with a scanner head no greater than 10cm in width, generating document data dependently upon the opticalscanning, comparing the generated document data to stored document data,the stored document data generated dependently upon a prior optical scanof the scan track, authenticating the document data using at least oneradio frequency scan, outputting an indication of the document beingincluded in the document management system as determined by thecomparing and the authenticating, and the authenticating storing anyvariations in the generated document data as updated stored documentdata.

A system for verifying that a document is included in a documentmanagement system is disclosed. The system includes a radio frequencydocument scanner including a scanner head no greater than 10 cm inwidth, a memory storing document verification data associated with thedocument, a computing system operatively connected to the radiofrequency scanner and the memory, and computing system executable codeaccessible by the computing system and operative by the computing systemto: receive data indicative of a radio frequency scan from the radiofrequency document scanner of a scan track of the document having radiofrequency readable information, generate document data dependently uponthe received radio frequency, access the memory to recover the documentverification data, compare the generated document data to the recovereddocument verification data, the document verification data beingpreviously generated dependently upon a prior radio frequency scanningof the portion of the document, and provide an output indicative of thedocument being included in the document management system if thegenerated document data is substantially identical to the recovereddocument verification data as determined by the compare.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Understanding of the present invention will be facilitated byconsideration of the following detailed description of the preferredembodiments of the present invention taken in conjunction with theaccompanying drawings, in which like numerals refer to like parts:

FIG. 1 illustrates a plan view of a substrate according to an embodimentof the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a block-diagram view of a system according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a plan view of a substrate and scan track accordingto an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a plan view of a substrate and multiple scan tracksaccording to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 illustrates a diagram of an RF signature of resonators positionedwithin a scan track in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram view of a system according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of a process for enrolling a documentto be authenticated according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of a process for authenticating anenrolled document according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 9 illustrates a plan view of an enrolled document according to anembodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 10 illustrates a plan view of an enrolled document according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 11 illustrates a plan view of an enrolled document according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 12 illustrates a scanner head according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

It is to be understood that the figures and descriptions of the presentinvention have been simplified to illustrate elements that are relevantfor a clear understanding of the present invention, while eliminating,for the purpose of clarity, many other elements found in typicaldocument processing systems and methods. Those of ordinary skill in theart may recognize that other elements and/or steps are desirable and/orrequired in implementing the present invention. However, because suchelements and steps are well known in the art, and because they do notfacilitate a better understanding of the present invention, a discussionof such elements and steps is not provided herein. The disclosure hereinis directed to all such variations and modifications to such elementsand methods known to those skilled in the art.

Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown a plan view of a substrate 1according to an embodiment of the present invention. Substrate 1 may besuitable for being written or printed on using conventional markingtechnology, such as ink or toner. Substrate 1 may be akin to aconventional sheet of paper. In the illustrated embodiment, substrate 1incorporates a plurality of passive resonators 5 a, 5 b, . . . , 5 n. Inthe illustrated embodiment, resonators 5 a-n are randomly disposed. Inthe illustrated embodiment, resonators 5 a-n are depicted as linesegments each indicative of a thin dipole antenna or dipole, such as anelongated metal or metalized article. Such a dipole is resonant at aninterrogating frequency related to the length of the dipole, forexample, at which the dipole is ½ wavelength in length. A wide varietyof lengths may be used depending on the desired resonant frequency andthe nature of the reader. In an embodiment, resonant articles 5 a-n maybe formed of thin dipoles having a thickness from about 100 angstroms to2 millimeters, and a length of about 0.5 millimeters. The density ofdiploes 5 a-n may be on the order of about 2 to 5 dipoles per square cmof surface area. Metalized glass fibers may also be used as the thindipoles; such fibers may be on the order of 0.001 inches in diameter.Substrate 1 may be manufactured in any suitable manner, including thatdiscussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,471,878 issued to the inventor hereof, andentitled METHOD FOR FORMING A RADIO FREQUENCY RESPONSIVE TARGET ANDAPPARATUS FOR VERIFYING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE SAME, the entiredisclosure of which patent is hereby incorporated by reference as if setforth in its entirety herein.

Referring now also to FIG. 2, there is shown a block-diagram view of asystem 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention. In theillustrated embodiment, resonators 5 a-n may be responsive to radiofrequency (RF) transmitter 20 that impinges them with an interrogatingRF signal 26. An RF receiver 30 may detect the resonators' 5 a-nresponse 36 to interrogating signal 26. In the illustrated embodiment,transmitter 20 includes a signal generator 22 coupled to an antenna 24for generating radio frequency interrogating signals 26 in a desiredtarget field. Receiver 30 may receive radio frequency response signals36 at antenna 34 coupled to signal processor 32. Signal processor 32 mayproduce an output 38 indicative of the resonators 5 a-n, and hence thesubstrate 1, within the target field in response to signals 36 receivedby antenna 34. In the illustrated embodiment, output 38 may be suppliedto an information processing system 39. In certain embodiments of thepresent invention, transmitter 20 and receiver 30 may be physicallyassociated in a single transceiver unit, and the functions of antennas24 and 34 may be performed by a single antenna. System 10 may bedesigned to detect radio frequency responses in the near field of theantenna(e), in the far field of the antenna(e), or both.

In the illustrated embodiment, information processing system 39 mayinclude a computing device, such as, for example, a computer.“Computer”, as referred to herein, refers to a general purpose computingdevice that includes a processor. “Processor”, as used herein, refersgenerally to a device including a Central Processing Unit (CPU), such asa microprocessor: A CPU generally includes an arithmetic logic unit(ALU), which performs arithmetic and logical operations, and a controlunit, which extracts instructions (e.g., code) from memory and decodesand executes them, calling on the ALU when necessary. “Memory”, as usedherein, refers to one or more devices capable of storing data, such asin the form of chips, tapes, disks or drives. Memory may take the formof one or more random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM),programmable read-only memory (PROM), erasable programmable read-onlymemory (EPROM), or electrically erasable programmable read-only memory(EEPROM) chips, by way of further non-limiting example only. Memory maybe internal or external to an integrated unit including a processor.Memory may be internal or external to the computer. Such memory maytypically store a computer program, such as, for example, code orsequence of instructions being operable by the processor.

It should be appreciated that when a substrate not incorporatingresonators 5 a-n is interrogated with system 10, output 38 will not beindicative of any particular substrate. However, when a substrate 1incorporating responders 5 a-n is interrogated with system 10, output 38will be indicative of the existence and positioning of responders 5 a-n,and hence substrate 1.

More particularly, transmitter 20 and receiver 30 may be positioned tointerrogate a predetermined portion of substrate 1. Referring now alsoto FIG. 3, there is shown a plan view of substrate 1 according to anembodiment of the present invention. Also shown in FIG. 3 is a scantrack 100. According to an embodiment of the present invention,transmitter 20 and receiver 30 may be positioned to interrogate scantrack 100 of substrate 1 in a temporal fashion, for example, transmitter20 and receiver 30 may temporally scan along, by being laterallydisplaced along, track 100. For example, substrate 1 may be laterallydisplaced over time relative to transmitter 20 and receiver 30, ortransmitter 20 and receiver 30 may be laterally displaced over timerelative to substrate 1.

Referring now also to FIG. 4, there is shown a plan view of anothersubstrate 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention. Alsoshown in FIG. 4 are scan tracks 100 a-100 n (two such scan tracks 100 aand 100 b are shown in the illustrated embodiment). According to anembodiment of the present invention, transmitter 20 and receiver 30 maybe positioned to interrogate scan tracks 100 a-100 n of substrate 1 in atemporal fashion, either in serial or parallel. Certain embodiments ofthe present invention may use multiple scan tracks for improvedidentification performance. Again, substrate 1 may be laterallydisplaced over time relative to transmitter 20 and receiver 30, ortransmitter 20 and receiver 30 may be laterally displaced over timerelative to substrate 1.

As shown in FIG. 10, scan track 100 may be positioned along shortestside 130 of substrate 1 (i.e., the side of substrate 1 having theshortest dimension). Scan track 100 may be coextensive with shortestside 130, or may cover only a portion of shortest side 130. Asillustrated, scan track 100 measures no greater than about three inchesfrom shortest side 130, and may measure no greater than about one inchfrom shortest side 130. As illustrated, scan track 100 measures nogreater than about one inch in width, and may measure about one halfinch in width.

As shown in FIG. 11, scan track 100 may be positioned such that itextends to only one edge of substrate 1 (scan track 100 x), or such thatscan track 100 does not extend to any edges of substrate 1 (scan track100 y). As illustrated, scan track 100 measures no greater than aboutthree inches from shortest side 130, and may measure no greater thanabout one inch from shortest side 130. As illustrated, scan track 100measures no greater than about one inch in width, and may measure aboutone half inch in width.

With the scan tracks 100 as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, a user does nothave to scan the whole document in order to verify that the document isauthentic. Instead, the user only needs to scan the portion containingthe scan track 100. This approach saves the user significant time,especially where many documents need to be scanned to verified theirauthenticity.

Referring still to FIGS. 3 and 4, substrates 1 identified therein alsoinclude a printed reference identifier 110. In certain embodiments ofthe present invention, such an identifier may be uniquely associatedwith the particular substrate it is printed upon. In certain embodimentsof the invention, such an identifier may be associated with a finitegroup of substrates, such as those in a particular package or providedto a particular user, for example.

Referring now also to FIG. 5, there is shown a diagram illustrating anRF signature 200 that may be sensed by receiver 30 by illuminatingresonators positioned within scan track 100 or 100 a-n with aninterrogating RF signal using the transmitter 20, in accordance with anembodiment of the present invention. The horizontal axis of FIG. 5corresponds to the position along a scan track 100, 100 a-n being read,and the vertical axis is the received signal amplitude. Waveform 200illustrates a received signal amplitude, while waveform 210 illustratesa clocking signal 210, which may be stored in a magnetic stripe orstored as optical markings upon a substrate for correlating the positionof the substrate with the received RF signal. Alternatively, clockingsignal 210 may be provided by or to receiver 30 independently ofsubstrate 1, and correlated with the lateral transposition oftransmitter 20 and receiver 30 relative to substrate 1. For example,clocking signal 210 may be correlated with movement of substrate 1 pasttransmitter 20 and receiver 30, such as by using a stepper motor to movesubstrate 1, or a sensor to detect the relative movement there-between.Conventional approaches utilized with digital document scanners may beused, for example.

When dipoles are randomly distributed along scan track 100, 100 a-n, theresponse created thereby may result in an RF amplitude versus positionwaveform, as illustrated by waveform 200 of FIG. 5. The amplitude versusposition characteristics of this waveform may be used to uniquely, or atleast substantially uniquely, identify or serialize scanned substrate 1.For example, RF waveform 200 may be converted to a digital code word. RFwaveform 200 may be digitized (or sampled) to form a digitized RFresponse signal, and the digitized RF response signal may be normalizedto produce a normalized digitized RF response signal, which may then beconverted to a code word. The digitized RF response signal may beconverted to a code word using the methodology discussed in theabove-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 6,471,878, for example. Such a codeword may be considered to be at least substantially uniquely associatedwith the particular substrate 1 scanned to generate/recover it.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, one or more tablesor databases may be stored so as to be accessible by computer 39 (FIG.2). For example, such a database may be stored in memory either local(e.g., internal or external) or remote to computer 39. Such a databasemay store codewords and information associated with the codewords. Incertain embodiments of the invention, the codewords may be used as anaddress or an index to a lookup table which stores informationassociated with the corresponding codeword. In certain embodiments ofthe invention, the reference identifiers may be used as an address or anindex to a lookup table which stores information associated with thecorresponding reference identifier. In certain embodiments of theinvention, a separate index value may be used as an address or an indexto a lookup table which stores information associated with thecorresponding index value. Associated information may be stored in sucha database so as to be correlated with the codeword, referenceidentifier and/or index value. For example, for each entry, associateddata may include: document owner information (e.g., name, address, phonenumber, social security number, and driver license number), documentcreation or registration date information, document revision dateinformation, document descriptor information and/or other informationrelevant to the document.

When a document is initially scanned and a code word identified, a usermay be prompted to enter the information to be associated with the codeword in the table(s)/database(s), such as by using computer 39 (FIG. 2).Accordingly, such a database, or one or more tables, may be populatedwith codewords and the associated information, such as by using computer39. Documents so scanned may be considered to be enrolled in thedatabase for later authentication.

Referring now also to FIG. 6, there is shown a block diagramrepresentation of a system 500 according to an embodiment of the presentinvention. System 500 additionally includes an optical energytransmitter 510 and optical energy receiver 520. In the illustratedembodiment, transmitter 510 may impinge substrate 1 with optical energy,while receiver 520 receives optical signals indicative of the markingsof substrate 1. In certain embodiments of the present invention,transmitter 510 and receiver 520 may be incorporated in a conventionaloptical document scanner apparatus 530. Apparatus 530 may be akin tothose used in digital document copiers and/or scanners, for example.Apparatus 530 may provide as output 538 data indicative of an opticalscan of substrate 1.

For purposes of completeness, scanner 530 may generally take the form ofa device that may detect markings, such as, for example, text orillustrations, printed on a substrate, paper, and translate theinformation into a form that a computer, such as computer 39, may use.Such a scanner may typically digitize the markings, dividing themarkings into a grid of boxes and representing each box with a datavalue, depending on whether the box is marked. The resulting matrix ofbits may be used to form a bit map that may be stored. Scanner 530 maynot distinguish text from illustrations; as both types of markings maybe represented as bit maps. Scanner 530 may utilize a charge-coupleddevice (CCD) array that includes a plurality of light receptors thatdetect variations in light intensity and frequency. Other conventionalapproaches, such as a photomultiplier tube (PMT) based scanner mayalternatively be utilized. Scanner 530 may utilize any suitableresolution, such as up to or greater than 600 dots per inch (DPI), forexample. Scanner 530 may be monochrome or color capable. Scanner 530 mayuse any suitable bit depth. Scanner 530 may be hand-held, page fed orpage based. Where clocking signal 210 (FIG. 5) is independent ofsubstrate 1, movement of the page or scanner relative to the other maybe correlated with the clocking signal. In certain embodiments of thepresent invention, conventional optical character recognition (OCR)technology may be used, such as by computer 39, to translate at least aportion of the bit map into ASCII characters, for example. Such ASCIIcharacters may be stored and associated with the scanned document forexample. In certain embodiments of the present invention, reference ID110 (FIGS. 3 and 4) may be converted into ASCII characters, for example.Alternatively, more or less of a scanned bit map may be converted toASCII characters via conventional OCR techniques.

Traditional scanning generally requires the scanning of an entiredocument to obtain desired information. Whole document scanning can be atime consuming endeavor, especially where multiple documents and/ordocuments with multiple pages need to be scanned. Whole documentscanning is superfluous and wastes time in cases where only a portion ofthe document (i.e., the scan tracks) needs to be scanned (in contrast tothe whole document) in order to achieve a desired result. The desiredresult, in the present invention, is to verify the authenticity of thedocument. One approach to this problem is described above, where only aportion of the document needs to be scanned. Another approach isillustrated in FIG. 12, which illustrates using a scanner head 140 thatis no greater than about 10 cm in its longest dimension. The smallerscanner head 140 allows the scanning to be completed more efficientlyand more expeditiously where only portions of a document need to bescanned.

Scanner head 140 can be integral with a scanner. Alternatively, scannerhead 140 can be coupled with a scanner via a wire connection or via awireless connection. In a wireless configuration, scanner head 140 canbe powered by batteries inserted into scanner head 140, powered byrechargeable batteries integral with scanner head 140, or the like.

While scanner head 140 is illustrated as a rectangle, scanner head 140can be a square, a pentagon, a heptagon, an octagon, or any otherpolygonal shape. Scanner head 140 can be a circle, an oval, or othersimilar shape. Scanner head 140 can also be a non-geometrical shape.

Preferably, scanner head 140 is no greater than about 10 cm in itslargest dimension, more preferably no greater than about 7 cm in itslargest dimension, and most preferably no greater than 3 cm in itslargest dimension. The largest dimension of the device is for example,the diameter if scanner head 140 is a circle and diagonal length ifscanner head 140 is a square.

For example, a 41/4″ RF scanner head 140 may be placed within scanner ata height of, for example 2-5 mm, and more preferably approximately 3 mm,above a document to be scanned. Thereby, a 1″ band may be illuminated,such as along the center of the scanned document. Thus, a signature forthe scanned document may be obtained with less dependence on mechanicalalignment of scanner head 140, and with decreased dependence on theorientation of the scanned document.

Referring now to Table-I, there is shown a table used to correlate dataindicative of output signal 38 and 538, according to an embodiment ofthe present invention.

Codeword (Signal Reference ID 38) (Signal 538) Doc. Info. 1 . . . DATAFILE 0010 . . . 0001 XXYY1122 Owner 1 . . . xxxyyy122.dat Name

The illustrated Table-I includes a single entry that may be generatedby, or responsively to, computer 39. The entry indicates a codeword of“0010 . . . 0001” corresponds to a scanned document having a markedreference identifier “XXYY1122”. Information associated with the scanneddocument may is also be stored, consistently with the above-discussion.Table-1 may also include a data file identifier. The substrate used togenerate the exemplary entry may be considered to be enrolled for laterauthentication.

In certain embodiments of the present invention, each identified datafile includes data indicative of the markings on the correspondingdocument, such as the bitmap represented by output 538, for example. Incertain embodiments of the present invention, the data file may includedata generated by manipulating either the codeword using the markingsindicative data or the markings indicative data using the codeword. Incertain embodiments of the present invention, the data file may beprotected, such as via conventional encryption techniques. In certainembodiments of the present invention, the markings indicative of data(for example, output 538 provided bit map data) may be encrypted usingthe codeword as an encryption key.

Referring now to FIG. 7, there is shown a block diagram of a process 700for enrolling a document according to an embodiment of the presentinvention. In the illustrated embodiment, process 700 begins withproviding a substrate at block 705, such as substrate 1 (FIG. 1), forexample. Block 705 may include providing one or more substrates, suchas, in the form of individual sheets or a pack of paper, for example. Atblock 710, the substrate may be marked in a conventional manner. Markingat block 710 may include handmarking, copying, ink-jet and/or laserprinting onto a provided substrate using a conventional document copieror printer, for example. At block 720, the document may be opticallyscanned, by using scanner 530 (FIG. 6), for example, to provide imagedata, such as a bit map indicative output 538 (FIG. 6). At block 730, atleast a portion of the marked document, such as, one or more scan tracks100, 100 a-n, may be RF scanned using transmitter/receiver 20, 30 (FIG.6), to provide an RF signature codeword by computer 39 responsively tooutput 38. At block 740, the RF signature codeword (block 730) andprovided image data (block 720) may be used to generate a data file,such as by encrypting the image data using the codeword, for example. Atblock 750, a record (for example, akin to the record shown in Table-I)may be generated by or using computer 39. The record may associateinformation, including the generated data file (block 740) with theoptically and RF scanned document.

Referring now to FIG. 8, there is shown a block diagram of a process 800for authenticating an enrolled document according to an embodiment ofthe present invention. In the illustrated embodiment, process 800 maybegin with providing a registered document (e.g., FIG. 7), at block 805.At block 810, the RF signature may be measured (analogously to block730, FIG. 7). At block 820, the document may be optically scanned(analogously to block 720, FIG. 7). At block 830, a verification datafile may be generated (analogously to file generation at block 740, FIG.7). At block 840, the record and data file for the scanned document(generated at block 750, FIG. 7) may be retrieved. At block 850 the filegenerated at block 830 may be compared to the file generated at block840. At block 860, if the files are determined to sufficiently match,the document provided at block 805 may be authenticated. At block 860,if the files are determined to sufficiently differ, the document may notbe authenticated.

By way of non-limiting example, file retrieval at block 840 may beachieved using any conventional manner. For example, where thetable/database containing the record is indexed by codeword, thecodeword generated at block 810 may be used to recover the file. Wherethe table/database containing the record is indexed by referenceidentifier (e.g., 110, FIGS. 3, 4), bit map data generated at block 820may be subjected to a conventional OCR technique to determine thereference ID and recover the corresponding file. Where thetable/database is otherwise indexed, appropriate queries may be carriedout (for example, by or at the request of computer 39) to determine thefile to be recovered. Alternatively, a user may be requested to enterone or more items of information (akin to the associated informationand/or reference identifier) using computer 39, which information maythen be used to determine the file to be recovered.

In certain embodiments of the present invention, documents may beupdated by re-enrolling or updating their enrollment. In such a case,the prior generated record may be appended or replaced, for example. Insuch embodiments, restrictive access/authorization techniques may beused to restrict enrollment updating. For example, when a document isenrolled, a password required to re-enroll or update the documentenrollment may be associated with the record.

It should be appreciated that stored data files represent optical imagesof scanned documents. The table(s)/database(s) and associated data filesmay be stored in memory for later retrieval for any desired amount oftime. Accordingly, a copy of a scanned document may be recovered at anypoint during this time, even if the original is lost or destroyed, byperforming suitable queries of the stored table(s)/database(s), usingcomputer 39 for example.

In certain embodiments of the present invention, substrate 1 may bepreprinted with information, e.g., so as to serve a fill-able form,prior to being provided to a user. Referring now to FIG. 9, there isshown a substrate 1 according to such an embodiment of the presentinvention. In the illustrated embodiment, substrate 1 has beenpre-printed as the first page of a United States Copyright Office FormTX, which is an application to register a non-dramatic literary work. Ofcourse, it should be understood that substrate 1 may be pre-printed withany type of information, and may take the form of any form, for example.Referring still to FIG. 9, as may be readily ascertained, Form TX has aplurality of spaces to be filled in by the user. According to anembodiment of the present invention, such a Form TX printed on asubstrate 1 may be enrolled and then provided to and filled out by auser. Such a form may then be authenticated, such as in accordance withthe processes discussed above. Thereafter, the authenticity of substrate1, and hence Form TX may be updated and/or confirmed by a third party.Further, should the form be lost, a copy may be recovered as discussedabove.

A desktop portable scanner may be utilized according to an aspect of thepresent invention. According to this aspect of the invention, a bootablecompact disc or other storage and readable medium may contain softwareaccording to the current invention. In such a configuration, a radiofrequency fingerprint may be included on the paper as discussedhereinabove. A similar radio frequency fingerprint may also reside onthe compact disc or other storage medium. Matching or linking of the twofingerprints, such as by computerized means, may allow the desktopscanner to operate according to the present invention.

According to an aspect of the present invention, the accuracy and/orability to detect error in the present system may be related to theability to detect the signal, that is, the signal strength. For example,an error of 1:200 million may result at 12 dB at a one foot distance.Such characteristics demonstrate that the signal level is the key toproperly identifying the document. Of course, such distance may beconsistently controlled through the use of the scanner of the presentinvention.

According to an aspect of the present invention, nanonumbers may beutilized to provide increased numbers of identifiable documents, andtherefore more security in document mapping. As is known to thosepossessing an ordinary skill in the pertinent arts, nanonumbers may bedefined as a random number raised to the power of another random number.By utilizing the serial code of the present invention, as discussedabove, nanonumbers of unique RF codes may be provided, and thereby thesecurity of the selection may be increased. In a particular embodimentof the present invention, a consumer may purchase foodstuffs having ananonumber serial code associated with the foodstuff. The consumer maycheck an optical scan of the foodstuff against the nanonumber serialnumber, which may be an RF indicated nanonumber associated with anoptically scannable bar code, for example, such as by sending theoptical and RF scans to the database of the present invention to therebyallow the database to identify the nanonumber serial number and respondby confirming that the document is in the database, and/or matches thedictated optical scan. Alternatively, the database may respond byconfirming that the serial number is counterfeit, such as, for example,by having the serial number not found in the database. Although such RFnanonumbering may be sufficient to determine if a document is, in fact,included in the database of documents, it may be unable to provideinformation regarding the veracity of the contents of the foodstuff.Thus, the optical scan of the document is relied upon to authenticatethe content of the foodstuff.

Thus, according to an aspect of the present invention, a RF scan of adocument may be performed. From the results of the RF scan, a comparisonmay be made to the database to determine if the RF signature is a validsignature as compared to the signatures stored in the database. In sucha situation, the RF signature comparison may be sufficient to determineif a document is, in fact, included in the database of documents. Anoptical scan of the document may then or additionally be required inorder to authenticate actual content.

According to an aspect of the present invention, the types ofdocumentation that may be authenticated by the present invention mayinclude, but are not limited to, testimony, documents that wouldotherwise be notarized, and documents that may be escrowed. Further,certified copies of documents of the present invention may be obtainedfrom the system of the present invention. Such authenticated, certifiedcopies may be requested from the system in order to replace missing ordestroyed documents, for example. The system may therefore operate in aclosed loop manner to identify, authenticate and/or recreate documents,and deliver those documents to the proper owner/holder as necessary.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, thedocument identifier of the present invention may be placed in the bottomleft hand corner, such as not to extend beyond 1″ from the bottom of thepaper and no farther than 3″ from the left edge, by way of non-limitingexample. OCR A may be the font used. The document identifier may beformatted to take the form -YY-IN-A1A1A1. The first two characters (YY)may alphabetical and signify the year, starting from the year 2000. Insuch a configuration, two alphabetical characters may allow for 783years, for example. A dash may be used as a separator. The next twocharacters (IN) may be a modified alpha numeric identifier that isindicative of the industry/section the document is associated with. Inthis configuration, there are combinations to allow for 1155industry/sections. The final six characters (A1A1A1) may be separated bya dash, and may contain a modified alphanumeric. The final sixcharacters may act as the unique identification, as describedhereinabove. In such a configuration, there are approximately1,544,804,000 possible unique identifications according to thisexemplary aspect of the present invention.

The number and identification scheme described hereinabove may besubject to change. For example, the schema set forth may not use thefollowing letters: O, S, Z, and I. Alternatively, for example, if moreyears are needed, the present system may be switched to employ amodified alphanumeric.

Similarly, RF scanning and/or authentication of documents may beincluded in shredders and other office equipment, such as copiers, forexample. Use of the RF scanning on office equipment may incorporate manyof the functions disclosed herein, including but not limited toprevention of unwanted copying and prevention of unwanted destruction.For example, in the case of a copy machine, an RF scan may be performedby the copy machine prior to allowing a user to select the copy button,for example. In such a configuration, the unique RF fingerprint may beexamined and reviewed in the database, and if the document is registeredas a not allowable to copy, or has some secretive nature, then the copymachine may not activate to copy the document, or may blank out thecopy.

In the case of a shredder, for example, the shredder may be equippedwith an RF scanner that scans the RF signature of the document prior toactivation of the shredding function. In the event that a particularsignature is detected, the machine may shutdown. Alternatively, themachine may query the database to determine if a destruction clause isassociated with the document fingerprint, or a no destruction tag, or aone-of a kind registration in the database, and, in one or more suchcases, shredding may be precluded.

An advanced system has been developed for event ticket reservation,purchase, and issuing designed to reduce overall event patron servicescost. The Eventicate™ system takes advantage of proven, patentedtechnologies. These patents are public, yet cannot be compromised evenby us and our licensed suppliers. The most recent of a series of patentscovering the technology for this system has been issued in 2010 and moreare pending.

Eventicate™ makes use of resonant electronic nano particles (REN)embedded in customer's custom paper. These nano resonators arerecognized electronically and create billions of natural random serialnumbers in the paper stock. A unique serial number is derived from thisREN paper and assigned to each ticket blank created, to be issued at alater date by the system. These REN serial numbers are naturallycreated, this prevents hackers from replicating the serial numbersstored in the Eventicate™ system since there is was no computergenerated key to be hacked.

This system helps to mitigate: Stolen ticket stock for sale; CounterfeitEvent Tickets; Control Blocking reservations by scalpers; Reducedstaffing costs; Personalized photo keepsake function for printedtickets; Parking area and street scalpers selling fraudulent counterfeittickets.

For major events the following features and functional steps are: 1) TheEventicate™ ticket material is produced in a secure manufacturingfacility to the customers requirement. This material we call the “BaseStock”; 2) The base stock is then sent to a licensed, secure converterwho prints the non variable images and graphics on the tickets. A visualrandom serial (VRS) number is printed on the face of this stock; 3)During converting and ticket printing process, each ticket produced isscanned and the nano resonator serial number for each blank ticket isplaced into a database linking both the printed ticket number and thenano random ticket number; and 4) These tickets are then separated intoticket stack sets up to 10,000 blanks for ease of handling. These stacksare placed in a kiosk.

Tickets are not valid until they are redeemed by the purchaser. When theticket is redeemed and printed, the, and transaction data is copied toan active database for that event, including the REN derived ticketserial number and the visual random serial number. The ticketinformation and the active database are both accessible when the ticketis redeemed, for example by a credit card user purchasing a ticket at aKiosk, or cashier/ticket window.

After a ticket is issued to a purchaser such as an event attendee, thenext step is for the attendee to present the ticket to a ticket readerat an admission point to the event venue, such as an open lane,turnstile, or closed lane with paddle or gate elements. The ticketreader scans the ticket to obtain the visual serial number printedthereon, and interrogates the ticket to obtain a confirmationREN-derived serial number. The ticket reader then accesses the databaseto compare the stored REN-derived serial number associated with thevisual serial number with the confirmation REN-derived serial numberjust obtained. If the presented ticket visual and has been altered ormodified and the disposition of the resonators thereon has changed, itsREN-derived confirmation serial number will not match. If the ticket isa counterfeit, the confirmation serial number, if one is evenobtainable, will also not match the stored value. The ticket reader willrecognize this within a second or two and respond, such as by lockingthe turnstile or alerting security by means of overhead signal lights.

Those of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many modificationsand variations of the present invention may be implemented withoutdeparting from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it isintended that the present invention covers the modifications andvariations of this invention provided they come within the scope of theappended claims and their equivalents.

1. (canceled)
 2. A method for verifying that a document is included in adocument management system, the method comprising: producing inaccordance with a customer requirement, material containing a pluralityof randomly distributed passive resonators positioned within each of aplurality of scan tracks, the scan tracks positioned to ensure at leasta portion of at least one track will be included with each of aplurality of document blanks formed using the material; printing anon-variable visual element and a variable visible serial number on onesof the plurality of the document blanks; directing an interrogationsignal to individual ones of the document blanks, operative to causeresonators disposed within the scan track portions included therein tocollectively emit a response signal specific to the individual documentblank; deriving a random serial number from the response signal, andstoring the random serial number in a database in association with thevisible serial number printed on the document blank; providing one ofthe printed document blanks with stored random and visible serialnumbers as a document to a document holder in a transaction, and storingtransaction data in the database in association with the random andvisible serial numbers of the document; presenting the document to adocument interrogation device; directing, by the interrogation device, aconfirmation interrogation signal similar to the previously directedinterrogation signal to cause the resonators in the document to emit aconfirmation signal; deriving a confirmation serial number from theconfirmation signal; obtaining from the document the visual serialnumber; comparing the confirmation serial number and the visual serialnumber to the stored document random serial number and the stored visualserial number; and outputting an indication of the document beingincluded in the document management system as determined by saidcomparing.
 3. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprisingprogram instructions for verifying that a document is included in adocument management system, wherein execution of the programinstructions by one or more hardware processors implement: producing inaccordance with a customer requirement, material containing a pluralityof randomly distributed passive resonators positioned within each of aplurality of scan tracks, the scan tracks positioned to ensure at leasta portion of at least one track will be included with each of aplurality of document blanks formed using the material; printing anon-variable visual element and a variable visible serial number on onesof the plurality of the document blanks; directing an interrogationsignal to individual ones of the document blanks, operative to causeresonators disposed within the scan track portions included therein tocollectively emit a response signal specific to the individual documentblank; deriving a random serial number from the response signal, andstoring the random serial number in a database in association with thevisible serial number printed on the document blank; providing one ofthe printed document blanks with stored random and visible serialnumbers as a document to a document holder in a transaction, and storingtransaction data in the database in association with the random andvisible serial numbers of the document; presenting the document to adocument interrogation device; directing, by the interrogation device, aconfirmation interrogation signal similar to the previously directedinterrogation signal to cause the resonators in the document to emit aconfirmation signal; deriving a confirmation serial number from theconfirmation signal; obtaining from the document the visual serialnumber; comparing the confirmation serial number and the visual serialnumber to the stored document random serial number and the stored visualserial number; and outputting an indication of the document beingincluded in the document management system as determined by saidcomparing.
 4. A system for verifying that a document is included in adocument management system, said system comprising: one or moreprocessors; computer-executable instructions stored on at least onememory and when executed by the one or more processors are configuredto: produce in accordance with a customer requirement, materialcontaining a plurality of randomly distributed passive resonatorspositioned within each of a plurality of scan tracks, the scan trackspositioned to ensure at least a portion of at least one track will beincluded with each of a plurality of document blanks formed using thematerial; print a non-variable visual element and a variable visibleserial number on ones of the plurality of the document blanks; direct aninterrogation signal to individual ones of the document blanks,operative to cause resonators disposed within the scan track portionsincluded therein to collectively emit a response signal specific to theindividual document blank; derive a random serial number from theresponse signal, and storing the random serial number in a database inassociation with the visible serial number printed on the documentblank; provide one of the printed document blanks with stored random andvisible serial numbers as a document to a document holder in atransaction, and storing transaction data in the database in associationwith the random and visible serial numbers of the document; present thedocument to a document interrogation device; direct, by theinterrogation device, a confirmation interrogation signal similar to thepreviously directed interrogation signal to cause the resonators in thedocument to emit a confirmation signal; derive a confirmation serialnumber from the confirmation signal; obtain from the document the visualserial number; compare the confirmation serial number and the visualserial number to the stored document random serial number and the storedvisual serial number; and output an indication of the document beingincluded in the document management system as determined by saidcomparing.